From Raymond  Rudorff,  Belle Epoque -- The Artistic Revolution, Part 1

Rudorff presents a general -- and generally quite negative -- view of the official artistic world of Paris in the late 19th century. As you read it, think about the roles that art played in French society and the ways that those roles helped shape what options were available to French artists.

 

Alexandre Cabanel, Expulsion of Adam and Eve, Paradise Lost (1867)

The kind  of painting, sculpture, furniture, interior decoration and  architecture in favour with  most Parisians who could afford them was distinguished by academic traditionalism,  a nostalgia for  past  styles  and  a total   lack  of imagination. In the paintings which the  prosperous bourgeois admired in exhibitions or  hung on  his walls, the  emphasis was on  a nearly photographic realism and  on subject matter. A painting had  to be “well done” and  the subject  represented  had   to  be  "picturesque'',  "dramatic" or “moving". Most of the paintings produced were narrative scenes, historical  or  military, sentimentally contrived incidents from everyday  life,  portraits  or  illustrations  of  Greek   and   Roman legends, the last  being  good pretexts for  representations of the nude. Such   paintings were  no  different in style  and  spirit  from those  that  could be seen  in homes and  art galleries  and  in thou­ sands   of  engraved reproductions  in  Berlin,   Vienna,  Brussels, Rome or  London. Where  Paris  differed  from other capitals was in its attraction for art  students from all over  the  world-lured to  the  city by its Bohemia and   uninhibited student life-and  in the exceptional degree of official  respect  paid to the most popular artists.

The last  three decades of  the  19th century in  Paris  saw  the apotheosis of the great  masters of what is now known as "official'', "Salon" or "academic" art. The art   they  produced faithfully reflected the standards, tastes  and  ideals  that  prevailed among France's middle and upper classes, and  in return for  their paintings  they were lionised in society and  honoured by the  state.

The works of most  of these  painters have  long  been  forgotten or if they are occasionally resurrected it is because of their curiosity  value,  their  "quaintness" or  because  of the  light  they  throw on  the  social  history of the  time. But  the  life and  civilisation of the  late  19th  century cannot be fully  appreciated if we ignore them because  such  works were more typically representative of the  society that produced them than those  of the  revolutionary artists. The chers maltres [“dear masters”]of the  Belle  Epoque [“Beautiful Epoch” – the term used by the French in the 20th century to idealize the decades just before the outbreak of World War I in 1914] are as much part  of the background of 1890's life in Paris as the  horse  carriage, the Second Empire-style architecture of the boulevards,  the   bustles and frills of elegant ladies and  the general air of comfortable opulence that older generations have recalled with  much nostalgia.

The   governments of the Third Republic decided that, like Louis XIV and Napoleon III, they too  would be great  patrons of the  arts. It was a chauvinistic age and in promoting art they felt that they were  promoting France's prestige as a great, powerful nation which had fully  recovered from the  humiliation of defeat by Prussia  in 1870. The kind of painting they admired and encouraged was grandiose, huge and  always  resolutely realistic  in style. It was the equivalent of the officially sponsored architecture of the time and the civil servants in the Ministry  of Fine Arts were lavish in giving

Adolphe-William Bouguereau, Admiration (1897)

commissions to officially approved artists  to decorate buildings  of public importance.The  painters  who  were called  upon  to cover  the walls of such buildings  as the  Sorbonne and  other  university premises, the Law Courts, the  Pantheon, the  Hotel  de Ville and  the  various mairies [city halls] were   invariably   those  who   had   undergone  academic training under   the  older  masters  at  the  Ecole des Beaux  Arts [the official art school in Paris]. They  were the  painters  who  had  won  the Prix de Rome  which entitled them  to stay at the  Villa Medici in Rome which  was the official Italian residence of the French Academy, and who steadily exhibited  at the official Salon  of French  artists every  year. The works they  produced for  the  official patrons may  still  be seen today. They  are like giant  illustrations for old-fashioned school history books, and mostly  consist of historical scenes like The Massacre of the Barbarians by Hamilcar,  in the Sorbonne building, or such  allegories  as Truth leading the Sciences  and  shedding her  Light over Mankind. All these  great frescoes  with  their  painstaking, detailed scenes  and  determined optimism are  perfect  examples of  that pompous, grandiloquent painting now given  the derisive name of pompier in France. Similar monumental  compositions were also admired in the Salon exhibitions which  played  such  an  important  part in social life, and  in museums which  bought them for the State.